The Xclipse 920 GPU in the Samsung Exynos 2200 reveals benchmark results

Samsung released the Exynos 2200 flagship chip this week, with a CPU architecture similar to the Snapdragon 8 Gen1 Dimensity 9000, but a GPU based on AMD RDNA2 to create the Xclipse 920, which supports advanced variable refresh rate, ray tracing, and other features, claiming to provide an unmatched gaming experience.

Samsung Exynos 2200

Recently, the Samsung Xclipse GPU benchmark scores were revealed through Geekbench 5. The Geekbench score shows that the test platform is Samsung SMS908B, 8GB RAM, Android 12 system, the final OpenCL score can reach  9143, the lower also has 8266. Wccftech identifies it The GPU has 3 Compute Units, which the media says could mean 3 WGPs, which means it could have 384 stream processors. Moreover, it operates at an astonishingly low clock speed of 555 MHz frequency, which was previously 2.3 times. 

Additionally, Geekbench boasts 4GB of video memory (which should be shared by system RAM) and 384 stream processors. In a side-by-side comparison, the Snapdragon 8 Gen1 is around 6200 in the same test, the Snapdragon 888 is around 4835, and the Apple A15 Bionic is 14556. The Exynos 2200’s end performance is still quite promising, at least as far as these performances are concerned. Of course, in addition to card performance,  final power consumption, temperature control, ion set optimization, etc. also need to practice for the final test.

Samsung Exynos 2200

Samsung Exynos 2200 is one of the most recent Armv9 CPU cores to be released. One Arm Cortex-X2 core, three Cortex-A710 big cores for balanced performance and efficiency, and four tiny cores for energy efficiency make up the octa-core CPU’s tri-cluster architecture.

See also  Rumored Exynos 2400 chipset specifications revealed

To get real-time news alerts and in-depth reviews, join the Technewsrooms Telegram group. You can also follow us on Twitter and subscribe to our Google News feed for updates.


Leave a Comment

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *